🔗 Share this article

The Evolution of a Cult tends to be characterized by clear stages.

1. The Big Idea

A charismatic leader or leaders present a new and transcendent idea offering a panacea for struggling players.

And so it goes. Plans are in motion to confront the system down in Brisbane. Tensions are rising. Conflict emerges from the sidelines. A lone figure, vulnerable, nervous, the slogan POSITIVE INTENT smeared across his chest as a symbol, has stumbled from the field and is being led away under a blanket towards an inconclusive loan stint in county cricket.

Do you ever miss the early days, when the world was still young? The era of early Bazball, of Bazball without brains.

2. The Honeymoon Phase

Team architects guarantee a fresh beginning, hope for a future, love, redemption within a community united in belief in the method.

What did it represent back then? A team united basking in glory. Ink. Forearms. Focus. Confident masculinity. Admittedly, The team often say Bazball doesn’t actually exist, amusingly as it’s denied, what did we see?

However, everyone understands its essence. It’s Harry Brook executing a stroke so outrageous it has to be pixelated. It’s the thrill of the captain in his final form, an expression conveying: thoughtful warrior, beard made of wood, natural look, genuinely raw you wouldn’t be surprised to notice and find him positioned on the ground stripped to the waist holding a fish.

It’s the opener continuing to have permission to talk in press conferences, resembling a happy little woodland creature in a waistcoat, saying stuff like we’re breaking down traditions. Certainly, the energy, for quite a long time, was entirely positive.

3. Expansion Period

Growth phase. Togetherness strengthened by rote learning of the cult’s slogans. These ideas can appear contradictory as a test of “true belief”.

Is it just me? The criticism, the anger, the sense of betrayal following the initial loss appears excessive, overdone. The batting collapsed during the match, as is typical there. They were savaged in the field for a couple of hours when tactics failed, carved around by the opponent playing aggressively but smarter, responsive to the situation, an athlete shining with brilliance.

And now we have this the pile-on, the anger, the perception of the team as a failure. The consensus is that losing isn’t enough, they need to lose righteously, to be purged, flame-throwered, defeated via traditional methods of Mitchell Starc’s movements, the conventional tactics of Scott Boland, out there celebrating successes with a bashful smile as if receiving a rewarding prize. What impact will this have?

4. External Conflict

Issues emerge due to setbacks. Yet, mistakes are denied. It begins to thrive on hostility externally.

In truth, half a week out the upcoming game, we have now reached an intriguing moment in the journey of this movement. England could quite easily win in the next Test through aggressive play. Alternatively, failure may follow. Should they fail it appears we really might be entering the decline.

Before that happens, there are two things worth saying about this. In the past, back in those heady early days, of passion and hope, a column appeared calling it a phenomenon. Criticism followed, which demonstrated as it’s known a method to show that it’s not a closed group is should followers respond with anger objecting to the questioning of the beliefs.

The developments in the last few days are equally notable. Criticism of the approach has turned into a movement. We have a uniformly angry internet, critical analysts, images of frustrated followers overseas cheated out of three days of cricket, like a room full of investors demanding recourse.

Meanwhile, we have the wider backdrop of Australia’s more nuanced more culturally hard-wired exasperation at these weirdly passive-aggressive buccaneers, claiming, the methods you value and have honed as part of your identity from the opposition, well, it’s all a bit of a gag after all.

And this is the real point. Everything is a cult. The style was a trend as the game has its own culture. Or rather, the team has long been exclusive, a clique, a garden party, a restricted environment with centuries of ceremonial past defining it. This has always been where influence is guarded. It’s the British pastime of England, the original sports washers. And surprisingly, the country is a phenomenon, a system of unknown levels, a place that literally still has a king.

The team have been sealed up within this world since childhood. Seeking change, to foster positivity, they are simply replicating their past, building another enclosure, an exclusive group, but doing it this time with a modern squad and a leader promoting authenticity as long as yourself is quite a lot like myself.

Live where your feet are. Run towards the danger. Despite efforts, things stay similar.

Reflecting on this, it might be appropriate to show understanding for the approach, to acknowledge its merits, which are significant. How to define it? Promoting liberation. Questioning traditions. Batting aggressively|Attacking with